The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 06:32, 28 July 2017 (UTC) reply

First Fate

First Fate (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the web notability guidelines. The sources given are all press releases, promotional pieces, or affiliated. 331dot ( talk) 15:10, 4 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 18:04, 4 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 12:41, 6 July 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete as per nom; the article is full of promotional copy and there are no good sources. Power~enwiki ( talk) 05:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.