The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep ( Non-administrator closure.) Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 13:20, 11 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Finland–Nicaragua relations

Finland–Nicaragua relations (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Due to lack of any significant recent relations. a mere stub CaribDigita ( talk) 17:54, 5 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• Speedy keep The article is sourced, includes several examples of bilateral relations between the countries and is as notable as corresponding articles on relations between two countries. The argument given for deletion, "lack of recent relations" is not a valid argument for deletion. Jeppiz ( talk) 17:59, 5 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• Keep The relations between the countries seem to be both recent and significant. Andrew ( talk) 18:09, 5 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. — innotata 20:33, 5 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. — innotata 20:34, 5 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. — innotata 20:34, 5 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• Speedy Keep That an article is a stub and has not been updated recently are not satisfactory reasons for deletion.-- TM 02:48, 6 October 2014 (UTC) reply
• keep no argument presented how a notability guideline is not met. Finland has provided significant assistance to Nicaragua as shown through the coverage. LibStar ( talk) 03:54, 6 October 2014 (UTC) reply
• Keep - this is a now a much improved article. Bearian ( talk) 19:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC) reply
• Keep. Being "merely a stub" is not a valid reason to delete an article. -- do ncr am 23:20, 9 October 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.