The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 10:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete This is more appropriate for a dictionary rather than an encyclopedia.
ShelbyMarion (
talk) 14:11, 20 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:20, 21 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. The subject is notable, and the article has potential to be expanded beyond mere dictionary content. An example of a substantial discussion of the concept and history of such candidacies can be found in the
CQ Press book Elections A to Z (
[1] or
[2]). -
Arxiloxos (
talk) 01:45, 26 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sam SailorTalk! 01:43, 28 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - A historically significant topic that passes
WP:GNG, and the article can be expanded well beyond dictionary content. Source examples include, but are not limited to: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. North America1000 06:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The BushrangerOne ping only 10:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.