The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL.
GiantSnowman 12:12, 11 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.--
Ortizesp (
talk) 17:02, 11 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep despite never playing in
WP:FPL, the subject passes GNG as there are multiple SIGCOV from secondary sources. Just search for the name on Google.
Notadogbutafish (
talk) 20:47, 11 January 2022 (UTC)WP:SOCKSTRIKE. JavaHurricane 06:25, 22 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep To show notability, you need in-depth coverage from at least 3 independent reliable sources. The subject clearly passes WP:GNG and we can also consider WP:VERIFY which is also an important concept.
PreppyElephant (
talk) 16:07, 16 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Fenix down (
talk) 20:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete No evidence has been presented to support the assertion that this meets GNG. The first three sources in the article are databases (not SIGCOV), and judging from what can be gleaned from the rest of the article's content, they don't appear to be more than routine, run-of-the-mill sports coverage. Playing for a reserve team isn't a particularly good reason to ignore this.
RandomCanadian (
talk /
contribs) 13:45, 20 January 2022 (UTC)reply
If it meets GNG, then please provide
WP:THREE sources to support this. Unsupported assertions are entirely unconvincing.
RandomCanadian (
talk /
contribs) 13:57, 20 January 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.