From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 14:15, 4 February 2018 (UTC) reply

FK Podunavac Ritopek

FK Podunavac Ritopek (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ifnord nominated PROD: The nomination says: No claims to notability. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL. But WP:NFOOTBALL is only for players. Not sure this article whether passes WP:FOOTYN or not, so let' s discuss it on AfD, thanks! Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 10:04, 28 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 10:07, 28 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 10:07, 28 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 10:07, 28 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 10:17, 28 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Thank-you for correct criteria. This club plays at a inter-municipal level, WP:FOOTYN criteria requires they have played for the national cup. No assertion that they have done so in the article. Ifnord ( talk) 13:28, 28 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 20:29, 28 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication of any other achievements garnering sufficient significant, independent coverage to satisfy GNG. Fenix down ( talk) 10:15, 31 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.