- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 23:54, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Eugen Kubala
- Eugen Kubala ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A promising young scientist, but at the moment there are no reliable and independent sources confirming that he meets WP notability standards. Vejvančický ( talk / contribs) 10:15, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. Vejvančický ( talk / contribs) 10:21, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Vejvančický ( talk / contribs) 10:21, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet our inclusion criteria for academics. No indication his work is impactful. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete fails GNG, created by SPA ( contribs) Jytdog ( talk) 04:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete As per nom- the lack of coverage in reliable sources means that notability of this young academic has not been established when judged against WP:BASIC or WP:ACADEMIC. Drchriswilliams ( talk) 08:53, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:05, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.