The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Recreation of a previously deleted article. No evidence of encyclopedic notability. Only one source. A Google failed to turn up anything that rings the Notability bell. Article fails
WP:GNG and
WP:GEOFEAT.
Ad Orientem (
talk) 18:23, 28 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Brasilian stadium who meets the
Campeonato Brasileiro Série B(fully professional league) criteria.
The stadium has an initial capacity of 10,000 people.
I am not sure what the (fully professional league) criteria is or how it applies to a stadium, but it's possible I may have missed something. Could you provide a link to the relevant guideline or policy in the English Wikipedia? Thanks... -
Ad Orientem (
talk) 19:13, 28 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
• Gene93k (
talk) 23:59, 28 April 2014 (UTC)reply
The stadium currently hosts matches about a fully professional league (
Campeonato Brasileiro Série B) so it respects the notablity and it isn't a small stadium.(10.000 spectators).
The team is notable so I assume that if a team is notable, then his stadium should be as well.--
Lglukgl (
talk) 22:53, 29 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Notability does not transfer and is not inherited. -
Ad Orientem (
talk) 23:58, 29 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep. Stadium notable enough, just like
Estádio do Canindé,
Estádio Anacleto Campanella, and others. Also, this stadium is very well known here in Brazil, despite the club and the stadium being from a small town (Luverdense defeated Corinthians last year in this stadium). Cheers,
MYS77talk with me ☺ 14:23, 2 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep - I don't know how one would even start to think that a stadium of 10,000 for a team in a fully professional league isn't notable. It doesn't take long to find a very recent newspaper article about the stadium
[2], I'm sure I'd quickly find more if I had access to newspapers older than 30 days.
Nfitz (
talk) 19:01, 4 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
RoySmith(talk) 12:16, 7 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep per the above comments; we generally find stadiums like this to be deserving of their own articles. --
Arxiloxos (
talk) 14:09, 7 May 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.