The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
KTC (
talk) 03:13, 6 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Though the article technically passes
WP:NSPORT, Rica has only three qualifying appearances six years ago, and the article fails
WP:GNG comprehensively enough to fall under the section the lede of
WP:NSPORT which says: [T]he meeting of any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept. (Emphasis original).
Sir Sputnik (
talk) 01:16, 29 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
Sir Sputnik (
talk) 01:16, 29 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - as per argument provided by Fenix down
Spiderone 09:38, 29 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - As noted by Fenix down, there is plenty of precedent to delete articles which technically meet NFOOTY but fall far short of GNG after time. —
Jkudlicktcs 11:23, 29 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - fails
WP:GNG comprehensively, and barely scrapes through NFOOTBALL. The former outweighs the latter.
GiantSnowman 09:53, 30 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - no indication article could satisfy the GNG.
Jogurney (
talk) 05:42, 4 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.