The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
Sir Sputnik (
talk) 23:56, 9 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment - Just to clarify the nommination,
Rupert1904 (
talk·contribs) posted the following to the deleting admin's talk page to contest the deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk) 23:56, 9 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Hey I'd like some reason as to why you deleted the Enzo Martinez page. I see "your rules" for deleting an article and I think the Enzo page met them. It had plenty of sources for the content and was still in the process of growing and getting better. I hope you rethink this and know that I will be a constant editor of his page so that it adheres to Wikipedia standards. Thank you and please let me know because there are plenty of pages on European, South American, African, etc. footballers who have less content on their articles and no sources. Please reconsider.
Rupert1904 (
talk) 14:21, 9 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete - per nom. The coverage of this footballer is
WP:ROUTINE, and he is yet to play in a fully pro league. As such, the article fails both relevant notability guidelines, namely
WP:GNG and
WP:NSPORT.
Sir Sputnik (
talk) 23:56, 9 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY
Mentoz86 (
talk) 20:38, 16 April 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.