- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 10:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Electronic Saviors Volume 3: Remission
AfDs for this article:
- Electronic Saviors Volume 3: Remission ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. No reviews, charting, good sales (gold). Notability is not inherited from the labels or bands. duffbeerforme ( talk) 11:05, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Perfectly notable compilation with plenty of coverage. A search yields many results, will place reliable resources on talk page; agree that improvement tag is still required after AfD- BusyWikipedian ( talk) 16:26, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:23, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:23, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: No significant coverage in reliable third-party sources, failing WP:GNG, doesn't pass WP:NALBUMS either. - Metal lunchbox ( talk) 18:16, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: No indication of notability, per Duffbeerforme. - Zanhe ( talk) 21:25, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.