The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomiator withdrawn.
Fenix down (
talk) 15:56, 7 February 2018 (UTC)reply
No indication of notability. Fails
WP:GNG. No indication the team has played for the national cup.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 05:37, 4 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
Hhhhhkohhhhh (
talk) 09:53, 4 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - teams playing in 4th tier of US soccer have long been considered notable.
GiantSnowman 10:46, 4 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep It may be a young football club, but as GSnowman pointed out they play in the 4th tier.
Govvy (
talk) 13:39, 4 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep Notable topic, play in a notable league, plausible term.
Quidster4040 (
talk) 02:21, 5 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - teams at this level are gneerally considered notable.
Smartyllama (
talk) 17:19, 5 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Withdrawn but once again, fourth division in North America is not as notable as it is in the UK. This team has no coverage and so we're deleting other articles because it does not meet GNG but we keep association football articles because of a faulty criteria.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 16:38, 6 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.