The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Completely unsourced. Trivial and non-notable. Fails
WP:GNG. Also see
WP:SPORTCRIT. Full of redlinks. Created as part of a large swath of pages by a single user who has since left.
Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:47, 4 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep A major trophy for a professional sports league is notable. -
DJSasso (
talk) 16:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete: I disagree; there's nothing inherently notable about trophies. And really, DJ, that line of reasoning opens up articles on Rookie of the Year trophies from the
Atlantic Coast Hockey League and the
Western Professional Hockey League, which I hope you'd agree is absurd. There's no evidence that this trophy meets the GNG ... heck, I haven't seen any evidence that the league does.
Ravenswing 04:51, 6 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete Very hard to find any evidence for notability, even from the PIHA itself which does not currently list it as a league award or maintain any listing of its importance.
18abruce (
talk) 00:28, 12 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.