The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LizRead!Talk! 07:20, 10 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep international footballer and goalscorer in his local league, some coverage here
1,
2,
3.--
Ortizesp (
talk) 22:25, 31 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - Per @
Ortizesp:. Besides the sources Ortizesp found, I found
4,
5,
6,
7 ,
8, and
9 among many many other sources. Significant young figure in Nicaraguan football with an ongoing pro and international career who has played for two of the top 4 Nicaraguan teams (Real Estelí and Walter Ferretti) and helped the latter win their only ever Nicaraguan cup in 2021. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks,
Das osmnezz (
talk) 05:39, 1 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Seriously? Youtube and facebook links?
JoelleJay (
talk) 02:12, 4 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete, coverage cited above does not amount to a
WP:GNG pass, being a collective of interviews, passing mentions and unreliable sources, none of which contribute to notability.
Devonian Wombat (
talk) 11:57, 1 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete (weakish) per Devonian's source analysis. I couldn't find much myself, either. The subject appears to have received some coverage, but not enough for notability. I did find
[3], which I do believe counts towards the GNG. However, more sources need to be found for notability to be demonstrated. —
Danre98(
talk^
contribs) 23:58, 1 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
GiantSnowman 12:50, 2 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep per sources above which show notability.
GiantSnowman 12:57, 2 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Lacks enough significant coverage to pass
WP:GNG. While the source from
User:Danre98 is decent (the rest is not), GNG requires multiple significant sources. Being an international, professional or having an ongoing career is irrelevant in AfD. If somebody finds additional significant sources, I am more than happy to change my !vote.
Alvaldi (
talk) 15:23, 3 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. The source from Danre98 is indeed the best of the lot, but I don't think it has enough independent secondary commentary on him to count towards GNG. Among the non-quoted material, there's too much content that's just restating what he said rather than providing analysis.
JoelleJay (
talk) 02:12, 4 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete owing to a lack of
multiple in-depth high quality sources with which to write an article. Fails GNG. Please don't waste people's time by putting forward Facebook and YouTube as sources, that's being disruptive. --
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 21:08, 7 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 21:29, 7 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete I think one source is not enough, thus it violates
WP:GNG.--
Tysska (
talk) 14:22, 8 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom and comments above - sources around are not good enough to confer notability. --
Angelo (
talk) 23:41, 8 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.