- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 04:36, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Dr. Antonio Da Silva High School and Junior College of Commerce
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dr. Antonio Da Silva High School and Junior College of Commerce ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lack of reliable sources, most sources are user generated content Ratnahastin ( talk) 01:40, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and India. Hey man im josh ( talk) 02:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep established in 1851 it is 172 years old.As per WP:NEXIST offline sources are bound to exist for such an old institution. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 06:48, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep very old, and seems to be mentioned in lots of old directories, which might be usable sources for its history, although they don't count for much in terms of notability. More importantly, it was the site of a major terror attack and there's lots of coverage of the school regarding that and subsequent closures of the school ( [1]). Its sports teams also seem to be somewhat notable, participating in most of Mumbai's major school-level tournaments ( [2], [3], [4]), and there's also some random coverage ( [5], [6], first source is a bit questionable). Overall, the coverage is somewhat spotty, but that's because schools in India aren't usually reported on by local newspapers like they are in the US, and the age really makes it unlikely that this isn't notable. AryKun ( talk) 07:44, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:43, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to reassess new sources added to the article. Does the deletion rationale still fit?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC)- Keep per @ Pharaoh of the Wizards. Okoslavia ( talk) 08:41, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems to meet WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 14:00, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.