The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 02:39, 11 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Donald Trump promise of Making America Safe Again

Donald Trump promise of Making America Safe Again (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic is not remotely appropriate for a standalone article: Trump's campaign positions and policy positions are covered extensively elsewhere, at Inauguration_of_Donald_Trump#Inaugural_address, to begin with. On a slightly different level we cannot create an article for every sound byte produced by every political leader; if this particular slogan ends up having enduring notability, we can recreate it when such can be demonstrated. Delete. Vanamonde ( talk) 08:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete as already covered in other articles, and there is no evidence that this is deserving of its own. O Fortuna! ^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 09:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete - Wikinews is that'a way. I'm still firm that the whole lot of soundbyte articles need to be deleted, ( Basket of deplorables, Alternative facts), as having basically no enduring encyclopedic value, but this is an even worse WP:NOTNEWS offender than even those. Wikipedia considers the enduring notability of persons and events.

This is not only of dubious enduring notability, but it's not even clear what the actual topic is, or what even semi-objective standard could be applied to justify inclusion or exclusion of content. Besides, it's just begging for both sides to dump in as much WP:OR as they can find, that can in any way be connected to whether we are "safe again" and/or whether we were safe to begin with. TimothyJosephWood 13:32, 6 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC) reply

• Strong Delete per above. The topic is already adequately covered in multiple other articles and there is not much to suggest that this article can offer any thing more to the subject. Inter&anthro ( talk) 16:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete Absolutely no enduring notability. Not suitable for an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a newspaper. AusLondonder ( talk) 21:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete per WP:SYN. There are a lot of notable topics being addressed here (stuff from his campaign, inaugural address, executive orders, etc.) but I don't think it comes together to make one notable topic. Although those things are notable, notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. LM2000 ( talk) 02:01, 7 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Obvious Delete for all the above reasons. Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 12:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete Should not have articles on WH press releases unless there are extraordinarily notable circumstances surrounding it. TheValeyard ( talk) 13:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Strong delete--Wikipedia is not about a collection of bits and bytes that any political leader may produce during his/her tenure. Winged Blades ^Godric 13:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete This looks like an attempt to set up a space in which criticisms of Trump can be collected without respect for NPOV, since almost all criticism of him can be related to this and argued to be noteworthy. While I have virtually no respect for Trump myself, I can't endorse something like this. WP policy trumps politics. Pun intended, thank you. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 16:01, 7 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete What even is this? The English itself is appalling, let alone the article title... TJH2018 talk 16:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete not notable enough for a separate article. White Arabian Filly ^Neigh 23:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Can someone SNOW this already? Why am I still seeing this on my watchlist? TimothyJosephWood 23:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • I kind of hope this AfD runs its full course, or at least for a day or two more. I've used the article as a salient example of Junosoon's article creations in a discussion at WP:ANI, which will fall a bit flat if people go to read it and it's not there. I think you can safely take it off your watchlist, Timothyjosephwood. Bishonen | talk 02:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC). reply
    • Adding: the ANI discussion has been closed now, so I have no further objection to a SNOW close of this one. Bishonen | talk 16:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC). reply
• Delete per everyone else... doesn't warrant its own article. Adamtt9 ( talk) 19:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete per WP:GNG. This phrase is used as a rhetorical device by many authors, but I couldn't find sources that talk about this phrase's history, significance, etc. -- Notecardforfree ( talk) 02:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Comment : About this article, it is about the official statement [1], which was issued on February 4, 2017, by Trump administration, so I think the title can be worked on, second section in the article, deals with the error in statement, for Australian Prime Minister, which made statement, notable, if proper toning or title change can help, looking forward for contributions for it. Thanks. Junosoon ( talk) 11:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC) reply

  The problem is, we really don't need a separate article for every official statement made by every world leader (or even every statement made by Donald Trump specifically). Such statements only need to be included in wider articles about, for example, each leader's policies. Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 12:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC) reply

I'm still waiting for an article about what the meaning of the word "is" is. Just sayin'. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 13:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete per the above and WP:TRIVIA most of which are better suited to belong in another article. - CHAMPION ^{( talk) ( contributions) ( logs)} 02:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Comment. : Nominator @ Vanamonde93:, would you mind looking through slogans articles , donot remember the exact , title but read it sometime similar to this article, Good days, as we cannot create an article for every sound byte produced by every political leader, from India too. I guess we have couple of them too, as this one. Kindly guide. Junosoon ( talk) 15:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC) reply

• Junosoon, I'm not sure what you want from me, or how this is relevant. I have no intentions of spending all my time hunting for similarly non-notable articles; but rest assured, if I come across such I will send them to AfD, regardless of who the creator is. If my memory serves, I have done so before this AfD, too. Vanamonde ( talk) 16:22, 10 February 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.