The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton |  ^Talk 18:51, 24 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Doctor Insta

Doctor Insta (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear advertising, regardless if intended or not, because if it wasn't for the fact we know the sources and information are advertising and also republished at that; searches naturally found only the same and the past deletion last year shows the sheer blatancy of wanting to restart advertising again hence WP:NOT boldly applies. SwisterTwister talk 19:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Well, I provided good number of references and most of them are from famous news resources such India Times and many more. I won't call it an advertisement but information sources altogether at Wikipedia. And yes, may be the last time the page was made, it could come under advertisement because the startup wasn't well known at the time and there were no good references from media. UsmanKhalil_ Talk 19:28, 13 December 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete Not as per Wiki standards. Wiki is not Funded company directory for sure. Media coverage (i mean how it is covered) is very poor on this one. Light2021 ( talk) 18:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete: A clear case of advertising. CoI is a problem too. WP:COI. Ceosad ( talk) 23:54, 18 December 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete advertising Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 02:38, 23 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.