From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Flaw (band). Kurykh ( talk) 21:06, 25 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Divided We Fall (album)

Divided We Fall (album) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM. First AfD was closed as no consensus. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 03:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 11:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - Some thoughts, since the last AFD didn't have much in the way of discussion.
  1. I'm relatively familiar with the band - I rewrote the whole band article within the last year. The band has a long history of drama, and no one on Wikipedia (beyond myself) who understands Wikipedia policy (or basic writing.) So things tend to stay in a terrible shape unless I step in.
  2. I've redirect the album article multiple times in the past, because it's typically unsourced and reads like garbage.
  3. The sources brought up at the last AFD, if you look closely, probably all fail WP:RS. "Ihateyourband.com" or whatever it is, is clearly a random blogger. Sputnik Music isn't usable when its a "user review", which fails WP:USERG. The only passable looking one is maybe "CrypticRock", and even then I'm not sure.
  4. There's a few articles like this, that announce the album, but generally don't really amount to "significant coverage".
  • Overall, I'm leaning towards redirect. The sourcing is extremely weak, and because of point #1, its not reasonable to think someones going to come along to clean this up any time soon. If this gains consensus, I'll be around to enforce it in the future as well, since I maintain the band article. Sergecross73 msg me 13:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E 05:55, 16 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep or redirect - Band is notable, therefore, the album article should be either kept, or redirected to Flaw (band). -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 05:05, 19 February 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.