The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete.
WP:REFUND applies because the discussion indicates a likelihood of notability developing in the not-too-distant future. Although I would more-or-less strongly suggest that a restoration would be to user space until such time as it is no longer TOOSOON.
78.26(
spin me /
revolutions) 04:15, 20 January 2019 (UTC)reply
The subject never played in a fully professional leadue. Whereas the article is unsourced, the Spanish Wikipedia article has sources, for example this is Sokkerway here:
[1], it only shows Primera B. Thereby the subject fails
WP:NFOOTY. I do not see correspondence to
WP:GNG either.
Ymblanter (
talk) 09:13, 12 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete He played a lot for the second division winners and transferred to a top three team in the premier division and is likely to become notable soon. That being said, I have no issues with deleting this without prejudice and recreating it when the time comes. It's not even worth draftifying at this point.
SportingFlyerT·C 19:43, 12 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - Carrasco is the subject of at least one article that would be significant coverage at El Mercurio, but I don't see quite enough to satisfy the GNG. It's very likely Carrasco will make an appearance for U. de Chile soon, but I think this is a case of
WP:TOOSOON.
Jogurney (
talk) 15:34, 14 January 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.