From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedied as a G4 of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deniz Kiziloz. Favonian ( talk) 16:00, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Deniz Toprak Kiziloz

AfDs for this article:
Deniz Toprak Kiziloz (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Primary claim to notability is the intention to buy a couple of football clubs, but no actual purchase appears to have happened, so there is no notability from ownership of those clubs. Second claim towards notability is chairmanship of non-notable gambling site. Contested proposed deletion.

There seems to be some attempts by the original author to inflate the notability/link depth of the subject by creating other articles with questionable notability:

-- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 21:03, 31 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 ( talk) 05:43, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 ( talk) 05:43, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 ( talk) 05:43, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 ( talk) 05:43, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as non-notable. I was willing to consider whether his intention to buy the football club might have conferred some notability (via media reports), but the article doesn't tell us anything about it. More to the point, the article on the football club doesn't mention the subject at all, so I'm assuming that any publicity that was generated was short-lived. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 06:46, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.