The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Editors may consider a possible merge to the parent article through normal channels. postdlf (talk) 19:42, 19 August 2016 (UTC)reply
please see this list and pass judgement.
I think it was worthy of a prod but just wanted to check the consensus.
this artist is not notable enough to have this ENTIRE extended discography hosted in a separate article. It's poorly formatted & poorly referenced. 2 of the 7 are primary, 2 are discogs, the other three are just about sales certifications of 2 of the songs. I couldn't find notability criteria on such articles, but I wouldn't consider this encyclopaedic. This belongs on discogs or elsewhere. Not sure where the line is drawn but this feels far from it.
Rayman60 (
talk) 23:54, 31 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Dane2007 (
talk) 04:48, 7 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anarchyte(
work |
talk) 07:04, 14 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.