From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — MusikAnimal talk 15:59, 26 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Danilo Saveljič

Danilo Saveljič (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A hoax European career, plus non-notable African career in non-professional league. Matthew_hk t c 03:31, 19 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Matthew_hk t c 03:34, 19 January 2015 (UTC) reply
source to prove hoax Turkish career [1], source to prove hoax Italy career: legaserieb.it, gazzetta.it, tuttocalciatori, calciatori.com. Matthew_hk t c 03:39, 19 January 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick t c s 06:52, 19 January 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick t c s 06:52, 19 January 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick t c s 06:52, 19 January 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete – I cannot find any corroboration that Saveljič ever set foot on the pitch for any WP:FPL apart from here, and I find it especially odd that he did not appear in the starting XI only once in his career. The number of sources is greatly inflated, as there are only four unique sources, and one of them (#14) doesn't even deal with this person or even association football. The source website for #2-12 doesn't seem very reliable as it only lists two players for the 2003–04 HNK Rijeka squad, and worldfootball.net does not verify that Saveljič was ever actually signed with any of the clubs in an FPL, much less on the pitch for them. Therefore, I cannot find any support that he meets WP:NFOOTY, and even if all the sources were reliable, it is all routine coverage, thus WP:GNG is also failed. — Jkudlick t c s 08:10, 19 January 2015 (UTC) reply
  • delete There's a person who puts massive amount of time into this hoax for several years now. At some point he had profiles on weltfussball.de and playerhistory.com. Now he accomplished the same with transfermarkt.de, though after reporting the profile they will delete it in the near future.. But you will never find actual news reports on football sites or his name in line-ups. For "his time" on the Cape Verdes please also see Cape Verde Islands 2009 - Match Details. -- Ureinwohner ( talk) 08:31, 19 January 2015 (UTC) reply
And that's only part of the reason those sources are considered non-reliable. — Jkudlick t c s 08:57, 19 January 2015 (UTC) reply
  • delete There is no any independent reliable news about this player to claim notability. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 09:08, 19 January 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Comment: much meat/sock vandalism & edit-warring going on there; I bet a swung flyswatter would splat at least three with one blow. Pax 12:16, 19 January 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL, notwithstanding the strong likelihood that this is a hoax. Giant Snowman 12:45, 19 January 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - apparent hoax with no reliable sources to verify the claimed appearances in fully-pro leagues. Jogurney ( talk) 14:02, 19 January 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTBALL as he hasn't played in a fully professional league and he doesn't have any senior international caps. IJA ( talk) 19:59, 20 January 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Player fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played in a fully professional league, nor senior international football. No indication of any other achievements that have garnered sufficient, significant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Would also salt due to hoax concerns which appear justified. Fenix down ( talk) 13:24, 21 January 2015 (UTC) reply
  • I concur with SALTing this article. However, we must remain vigilant regarding the multiple alternate spellings possible. —  Jkudlick  t c s 03:55, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

When you will delete article can some admin do today-- Salah44 ( talk) 15:07, 21 January 2015 (UTC) reply

If an uninvolved admin invokes WP:SNOW, then the debate can be closed early. Otherwise, the process needs to play out for at least seven days. —  Jkudlick  t c s 03:41, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.