The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 19:12, 4 December 2012 (UTC) reply
article gives no indication of notability, and i could not find any refs online aside from their website, which is in beta Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 09:55, 27 November 2012 (UTC) reply
OK, I had not looked at the article's history - but I have also been here long enough to know that vandalism normally gets reverted by ClueBot. Does any one know who attempted this bad reversion of vandalism? Incidentally, I see that the bad English has been improved upon now - the article is in better English than it was. ACEOREVIVED ( talk) 15:17, 4 December 2012 (UTC) reply