The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Yep, this club promoted to third league, winning Regional Amateur League. So all the info is true. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Gmickey92 (
talk •
contribs) 08:58, 26 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Being true is not an issue here. This is (quoting from FOOTY notability page): "All teams that have played in the national cup (or the national level of the league structure in countries where no cup exists) are assumed to meet WP:N criteria. Teams that are not eligible for national cups must be shown to meet broader WP:N criteria." And this team doesn't. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 07:29, 29 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
• Gene93k (
talk) 00:55, 27 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete - no evidence of notability.
GiantSnowman 18:30, 27 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete - Does not meet any relevant standard.
Gigs (
talk) 17:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete – notability has not been established. C679 20:49, 4 December 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.