- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No real need to userfy properly given the only two meaningful-for-CC edits are by the person who recreated it in userspace. Once the individual reaches the threshold for notability (that the creator concedes that he hasn't yet), please move back to articlespace. Daniel ( talk) 12:42, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Connor Brandt
- Connor Brandt ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by an IP based on speculation as to future appearances, which is never grounds for notability. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 17:20, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 17:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 17:35, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 17:35, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Player fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played in a fully professional league, nor senior international football. No indication of any other achievements that have garnered sufficient, significant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Fenix down ( talk) 15:31, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral - I realise that I made this a little presumptively, and I can hardly argue that he qualifies right now. However, I've taken a copy of this page on my own subspace so if this gets deleted then I'll just wait until he records a match at professional level and repost it. If you want to delete it, I won't challenge. Falastur2 Talk 19:39, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:09, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. @ Falastur2: we can properly userfy it if you wish? Giant Snowman 19:35, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - What would the difference be between what I already have on my subspace and you userifying it? But if you userifying grants some extra benefits, then please do.
Falastur2
Talk 19:39, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- @
Falastur2: The advantage of userifying the article is that it would retain its current editing history, if that's something you care about.
Sir Sputnik (
talk) 17:06, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- @ Sir Sputnik: Well it's not hugely important to me, but on the other hand there's no down side to it, so if you want to userify the article to my subspacethen I invite you to. Falastur2 Talk 19:24, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- @
Falastur2: The advantage of userifying the article is that it would retain its current editing history, if that's something you care about.
Sir Sputnik (
talk) 17:06, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - What would the difference be between what I already have on my subspace and you userifying it? But if you userifying grants some extra benefits, then please do.
Falastur2
Talk 19:39, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete – WP:TOOSOON. Once he plays on the pitch, the article can be recreated. Not opposed to userfying the article to Falastur2's space for future recreation once WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG are met. — Jkudlick t c s 02:07, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.