The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
Spiderone 14:24, 2 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - non-notable training ground, not even worth merging/redirecting.
GiantSnowman 14:37, 2 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete or redirect to
UD Las Palmas - no evidence of coverage in independent sources sufficient to establish notability for a stand-alone article. Some of these training grounds at least act as a stadium for the B team but this one isn't even that!
Spiderone 22:31, 4 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep Training complex of a famous club, lots and lots of sources:
Redirect. It's just a training ground, not a main field. Many clubs have training grounds. Re-direct to club's article
UD Las Palmas or to club's stadium article
Estadio Gran Canaria. OR delete otherwise per above
RedPatchBoy (
talk) 13:12, 9 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: No clear consensus and it would be est to try to discuss the sources presented that supposedly support gng.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Fenix down (
talk) 13:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment - the sources are all invariably just an announcement that the training ground will be opened on 8 July. Since all the sources are practically saying the same thing, I wouldn't say that they amount to significant coverage.
Spiderone 14:59, 9 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.