The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Merge to
Round-robin tournament as a section. This can be sourced pretty easily
[1] but it's not really notable. It's not a topic unto itself, it's just a well-known issue that can arise with RR tournaments (anyone who runs tournaments will be familiar with it, and it's one reason that people move quickly away from RR to double-elimination instead, when feasible). I even devised a "demi-finals" system for resolving it, before I learned better, and I'm sure I'm not alone. The kind of silly name originates, from what I can tell, from
ACUI and their
College Bowl competitions (they also do concurrent pool tournaments and several other
intramural competitions between various North American colleges and universities). College students are precisely the kind of crowd who would come up with such a name, so it's not particularly dubious, especially since a fair amount has been written about it. But it's not significant coverage in high-quality, independent, reliable, secondary sources. It's enough to pass
WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE as article content, but not enough to pass
WP:N as its own page. PS: Regardless, remove the over-capitalization and render this as "circle of death" per
MOS:CAPS. If "round-robin tournament" is not a
proper-noun phrase, then a round-robin tournament gone awry isn't one either. See also
WP:SPORTCAPS. —
SMcCandlish☏¢ 😼 01:24, 2 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge to
Round-robin tournament - I've taken action and rewrote the round robin tournament page already in order to incorporate the idea presented here, so the article can be safely deleted.
SportingFlyertalk 10:53, 2 August 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.