The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Missvain (
talk) 22:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The article does not meet
WP:GNG or
WP:NBUILD. It makes no claim for general notability
WP:GNG or historic, social, economic, or architectural importance
WP:NBUILD.
WP:BEFORE revealed normal
WP:ROUTINE,
WP:MILL mentions/promos/ads, and directory style listings. //
Timothy :: talk 23:12, 21 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep This is a very well know landmark in Phoenix and covered in dozens of articles. A quarter-million people signed a petition to save it from demolition. The article needs better referencing.
MB 03:31, 22 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Like with Los Arcos, the problem here is lack of sourcing. There is also apparently a story from 1997 in Preservation magazine on the demolition; it is, like Los Arcos, going to clobber the GNG. Next time you see an article on a Phoenix-area topic, call on me or MB, because we have the Newspapers.com access to fix this sort of stuff. Here's just a taste:
[1],
[2],
[3][4],
[5]Raymie (
t •
c) 07:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Easily passes
WP:NBUILD. Just needs to be properly referenced.
SportingFlyerT·C 17:28, 22 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.