The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. → Call meHahc21 19:03, 18 March 2014 (UTC)reply
very local society of no demonstrable importance
'DGG (at NYPL)' (
talk) 20:03, 11 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Redirect. There needs to be a
List of natural history societies, to list this and others with articles, e.g.
Birmingham Natural History Society, and others without articles (many, per Google). Then redirect to that list. The current article has nothing/little more than is needed for an entry in a list. There exists
List of historical societies, but I think natural history societies are different. If someone would start the list-article, i would help develop it. --
doncram 21:33, 11 March 2014 (UTC)reply
delete We're
WP:NOTDIR and I see no evidence that this article has any scope to ever be anything more than that. Some local societies, such as
BRLSI, are far more than this and justify their articles, but I'm not seeing it for Chorley.
Andy Dingley (
talk) 16:25, 12 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete -- Looks like a very lcoal society to me.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 17:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC)reply
delete fails WP:ORG. Article has almost no content.
LibStar (
talk) 13:28, 18 March 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.