- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 00:16, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Chimpmania
- Chimpmania ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable website known for hosting vile content. Lacks in-depth, non-trivial support. References relate to the work to remove the site from the provider and site examples of content. reddogsix ( talk) 16:56, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 18:22, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
I'd say it is noteworthy as other sites such as white supremacist websites have articles. And this site in particular has appeared on the news numerous times due to it's content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CFB9:AAF0:7943:9445:5AC7:3337 ( talk) 14:50, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - covered in multiple reliable sources. FiredanceThroughTheNight ( talk) 23:46, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus established
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 02:36, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Relisting comment: No consensus established
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 02:36, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. While it's true that Wikipedia is not censored, that doesn't mean we need to go out of our way to publicize hate sites like this. If there were good solid references, that would be one thing. But, the list of sources is pretty weak. One of the better sources listed in the article is The Dallas Observer. Our own article describes it as a free alternative weekly, with a circulation of 43k. That's hardly mainstream media. The Nation is generally a solid source, but the cited article just mentions Chimpmania in passing. None of the other references impress me as good sources. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:42, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, nn. Szzuk ( talk) 15:56, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.