- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:56, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Chiltern Badminton Club
- Chiltern Badminton Club ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable organization. Lacks GNG to justify an article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 21:56, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:48, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:48, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Speedy Delete A7. At the very least, a prod. No notability established, and I doubt it ever could be established. South Nashua ( talk) 13:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Delete Scratch that. Prod was probably the best route here. South Nashua ( talk) 14:55, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:42, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. The related page Reading Badminton Association should probably go through AfD as well. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 19:27, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not a web host for clubs. See WP:Alternate outlets. Unscintillating ( talk) 21:45, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.