The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:42, 3 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Chbar Morn Football Club

Chbar Morn Football Club (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This Football club appears to play in an amateur league. The article has no incoming links, nor does it have any meaningful content other than an infobox with a few redlinks. Bikeroo ( talk) 06:57, 25 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Bikeroo ( talk) 07:00, 25 September 2014 (UTC) reply

• Speedy Delete - Serves no purpose, fails WP:GNG as the Cambodian 2nd division is not notable. JMHamo ( talk) 07:18, 25 September 2014 (UTC) reply
  • None of which meet the criteria for speedy deletion. WP:USELESS. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:18, 26 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:36, 25 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:36, 25 September 2014 (UTC) reply

• Comment - Needs sourcing, but club appears to play in a national league structure? Fenix down ( talk) 13:59, 25 September 2014 (UTC) reply

• I would say a Cambodian team playing in the top tier is notable, but this is a second tier club. JMHamo ( talk) 14:47, 25 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:54, 25 September 2014 (UTC) reply

• But the long standing WP:FOOTY view is participation in a national competition (i.e. a national league pyramid or cup competition) is sufficient. Not saying keep, as there is very little hear, but it seems strange we have very low level teams in England who are deemed notable because they have competed in the FA Cup once but a team competing in a country's second teir is not. Fenix down ( talk) 15:55, 25 September 2014 (UTC) reply

• That aside, it fails WP:GNG quite comprehensively... not many, if any reliable sources. JMHamo ( talk) 16:02, 25 September 2014 (UTC) reply

• I'd agree, I can't see anything on the club really and RSSSF has no record of it taking part in a cup competition from their admittedly sparse records, but I wouldn#t go so far as to say the Cambodian second teir makes clubs inherently non-notable. Fenix down ( talk) 16:50, 25 September 2014 (UTC) reply

• Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 19:07, 26 September 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.