The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Courcelles 23:58, 29 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Clearly does not meet the notability guideline.
Slashme (
talk) 15:46, 22 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete I cannot find any secondary sources that discuss Ms. Barnes. The sources provided are either primary sources or tangentially mention her. I also cannot find any sources on my own search. Seems like a vanity page.
Angryapathy (
talk) 16:09, 22 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Reaper Eternal (
talk) 17:52, 29 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete. A lack of independent sources coupled with some very difficult-to-unravel COI and NPOV problems suggest this isn't more than a vanity page and/or spam.
Several Times (
talk) 18:31, 29 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete, having notable clients doesn't make her notable.
NawlinWiki (
talk) 20:05, 29 August 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.