The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Sam Walton (
talk) 19:32, 27 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Sources are associated with the subject; no real indication of meeting
WP:GNG. —
Swpbtalk 16:37, 12 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete No indication his activities rise to the level of notability.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 04:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
UY ScutiTalk 15:37, 19 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. —
Jkudlicktcs 12:40, 21 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - no evidence of notability, fails
WP:GNG.
GiantSnowman 13:09, 21 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - as per nom and above editors. Searches did not turn up evidence they meet notability guidelines.
Onel5969TT me 14:25, 27 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.