From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per discussion. -- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 18:56, 14 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Cantagalo Esporte Clube (Paraná)

Cantagalo Esporte Clube (Paraná) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
  • Delete - Seems like one of them pub league teams. Thursby16 ( talk) 20:56, 7 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Association football sports club that briefly existed, but played at far too low a level to be considered notable. Safiel ( talk) 01:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:47, 8 April 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:47, 8 April 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:47, 8 April 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - low-level team, no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 10:38, 10 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Fails WP:FOOTYN no indication the team has particiapted in a national competition, no indication of any other achievements garnering sufficient significant, reliable coverage to satisfy GNG. Fenix down ( talk) 07:39, 11 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - small team and really poor article. Inter&anthro ( talk) 18:50, 11 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as nothing at all to suggest better notability and improvements. SwisterTwister talk 05:19, 12 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete fail WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. Joseph2302 ( talk) 21:19, 12 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per Fenix down. WP:GNG not met. C 679 08:32, 14 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Per all of the above. VictoriaGrayson Talk 18:05, 14 April 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.