- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Should the subject meet WP:NFOOTBALL in the near future, please ping me and I can provide a copy of the article. Nakon 23:23, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Cameron Brannagan
- Cameron Brannagan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Concern was that he Has not made an appearance a fully professional league yet. PROD was contested without a reason being provided. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 08:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 08:56, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 17:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:50, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:51, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:51, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- keep I don't understand the claim re "fully professional league". Surely his appearance, albeit as a sub, against Oldham would count? If it doesn't, surely this would have to be because "subs aren't notable", which isn't how I read the team sports practice so far. Andy Dingley ( talk) 18:55, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
-
WP:NFOOTBALL explicitly says that to qualify under that guideline a footballer must have actually appeared in a match. Simply being named to the bench is insufficient.
Sir Sputnik (
talk) 18:58, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- Fair enough, if the UK guideline is specific on that.
- I still wouldn't delete it (maybe userfy it). I suspect it'll be coming back very soon and there's no point in sheer make-work. Andy Dingley ( talk) 01:33, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.