From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 21:09, 8 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Callum Hall

Callum Hall (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a biography of someone completely different to the page title. It also has no references whatsoever and has very little content. | Naypta talk opened his mouth at 16:27, 1 July 2015 (UTC) reply

  • Delete per WP:NFOOTY. As the article has been updated to read, Hall has signed a professional contract with Plymouth Argyle. However, he has not played for them yet, and it's not clear if he'll play for the first-team squad immediately, or if he'll play further ball at the academy level (or on loan to a lower-level team). At any rate, until he has a fully-professional cap, he's not notable. — C.Fred ( talk) 16:38, 1 July 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Agree, just the fact that he's been signed does not make him notable. But if we delete this one, shouldn't we delete the almost identical article on Louis Rooney, another just-signed player? ubiquity ( talk) 16:55, 1 July 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:54, 4 July 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:55, 4 July 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:55, 4 July 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:55, 4 July 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.