The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 19:24, 2 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Non-notable country club PR-piece with nothing more than
WP:MILL coverage and hyper local mentions. Being on land once owned by someone famous isn't in itself notable, as I'm pretty sure everything in existence would be if we used that as a measure.
Praxidicae (
talk) 19:18, 25 April 2019 (UTC)reply
It is slightly more unusual to find land in the US that can be traced to a reigning British monarch a decade before American independence. However, I find the claim "In 1760 the land was part of a royal grant given to King Charles" somewhat odd, since
Charles II of England died 75 years earlier.
Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 20:02, 25 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Nothing notable from a golf point of view. Just routine content like any other golf course.
Nigej (
talk) 08:27, 26 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Not notable golf course.
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof? 09:49, 28 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Not notable enough to warrant a wikipedia page. Also, are the specifics of electronic devices within the Boardroom really nessecary?
Cheesy McGee (
talk) 12:33, 28 April 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.