- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I'll bet a pound to a pickle that the arguments about WP:CORPDEPTH have gone unrebutted and carry the discussion. A Train talk 08:48, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Brand Attic
- Brand Attic ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable organisation. -Claim of notability thinner than a pink Rizla, and a dollar to a donut the daily mail references are the result of active PR hacks. TheLongTone ( talk) 12:15, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 13:47, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 13:47, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Featured in the Daily Express and the Daily Mail? One presumes they made some 14-year old daughter-of-a-celeb look "leggy" and "all-grown-up" therefore attracting salivating coverage from these unreliable sources. If this really is the best that can be produced to show notability, there's a very, very long way to go. Mabalu ( talk) 13:56, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Passes WP:GNG by coverage in major UK newspapers. Daily Mail is discredited as a source of personal information but not about anything else. Also, please drop the wacky prose guys, this isn't creative writing class. (Dollar a to a donut? All-grown-up? Urgh!) Manc1234 ( talk) 14:14, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- Don't be so stuck up. TheLongTone ( talk) 14:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 04:20, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 04:20, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, trivial mentions in sources thinner than a schenectady sardine.-- SamHolt6 ( talk) 15:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG and references fail the criteria for establishing notability WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing ++ 17:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.