Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bojan_Bigović References

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Mr. Z-man 04:08, 7 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Bojan Bigović

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 20:01, 27 October 2013 (UTC) reply

I am also nominating the following articles for the same reason. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 20:03, 27 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 20:03, 27 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:53, 27 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:53, 27 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:53, 27 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Delete all - per Sputnik, WP:NFOOTY failures, no FPl or senior intl apps. No indication of any other achievements garnering significant reliable coverage to satisfy GNG. Fenix down ( talk) 10:59, 28 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Delete all - fail WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 11:27, 28 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Delete - there's nothing out there that would suggest significant coverage, fails WP:NFOOTY. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 14:54, 28 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Delete all: All fail WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. -- ArsenalFan700 ( talk) 14:39, 30 October 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.