Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Blue_Moon_(fanzine) References

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:56, 6 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Blue Moon (fanzine)

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable football fanzine, amateur publication, fails WP:GNG. Article lacks sufficient reliable sources to assert notability. Jellyman ( talk) 18:31, 30 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Delete book source does not appear to be about the fanzine itself, and there is no link for the cited Peterborough Evening Telegraph article. I'm struggling to find one via Google. There's a passing reference in this book, but to me there is no need for an article. Peterborough United F.C. could mention the important facts about this zine in a line or two. = paul2520 ( talk) 19:15, 30 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:14, 30 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:14, 30 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:14, 30 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Delete Poorly sourced article about a defunct fanzine. Not enough evidence of significant notability. Kind Tennis Fan ( talk) 03:18, 2 November 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.