The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Michig (
talk) 10:51, 27 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Same reason as previous AfD four years ago - film announcements, which are all that's available on web, aren't enough for
WP:NCORP.
Hemantha (
talk) 06:25, 20 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Fully agree with
Hemantha here that announcements about films and an empty award section make this article lack the level of substance required for an article on Wikipedia. It appears that the same issue since 2015 has remained unresolved. I lean towards a delete rather than speedy delete.
InfiNeuro (
talk) 06:53, 20 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete None of the references mention the actual company in more than a passing fashion. Fails
WP:NCORP. Some of the films produced by the company are notable, but
WP:NOTINHERITED. GoldMiner24Talk 16:15, 20 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete: per nom. Does not meet NCORP. --
Ab207 (
talk) 17:22, 20 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Just because a company produces films, doesn’t mean they are notable. As others have said there’s no awards issued to them, independent press coverage about actual films, no information on the publics response etc.
GeekBurst (
talk) 17:02, 22 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete a simple company with no notable achievements.
Misasory (
talk) 21:12, 26 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.