The result was delete. The consensus here does not appear to have accepted that the sources provided by Floydian are sufficiently independent and reliable to confer notability. Rather the most prevalent feeling is that the album should be released first. This discussion has been online for almost four weeks, and the release is scheduled to happen fairly shortly. If and when the album is released, another evaluation of the subject against WP:NALBUMS may be made. Restoration of the content may be a possible option at that point, but the article at present is fairly short, and reviews that allow a better article to be written often become available when the album is actually released. Sjakkalle (Check!) 19:46, 25 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NALBUM and also falls foul of WP:CRYSTAL. CaptainScreebo Parley! 14:51, 29 April 2012 (UTC) reply
Also, Floydian, this raises the question: If you think the sources belong in the article, why haven't you added them by now? For that matter, why hasn't anyone else? If editors aren't willing to work toward getting the article up to basic WP:NALBUM standards now, when the existence of the article is on the line, then they're certainly not going to do it after a decision to keep it has been made.-- Martin IIIa ( talk) 15:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC) reply