From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠ PMC(talk) 01:13, 17 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Awonusi Abiodun

Awonusi Abiodun (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

run of the mill business person, not notable, fails all the criteria. Praxidicae ( talk) 22:34, 9 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:46, 9 November 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:47, 9 November 2020 (UTC) reply

*Keep User:Geschichte if it's based on his app creation time, he has been creating app since 2019, and that's plenty of time it's opinion on Geschicte though. Lynndonald ( talk) 19:48, 11 November 2020 (UTC) reply

*Week keep This person runs podcast for a news website in Nigeria, and create apps which is on Google play. He might meet one of the criterias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joedray ( talkcontribs) 11:17, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Could you elaborate on where you're seeing actual coverage, Bearian? I wouldn't call the app notable considering we just deleted it. Praxidicae ( talk) 19:27, 13 November 2020 (UTC) reply
There's been some news articles but some appear to be a similarly named relative. Bearian ( talk) 19:33, 13 November 2020 (UTC) reply
I am able to google search too, I wanted to know what sources specifically you are referring to, because none of those in the news search or in the article are remotely reliable and in fact almost none of those showing in gnews are even about him. Praxidicae ( talk) 19:35, 13 November 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 23:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 23:23, 14 November 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - ref 1 is written by him, ref 2 is a blog, ref 3 is a link to his podcast, ref 4 is painfully brief, ref 5 is a link to download his app, ref 6 is written by him. I'm not seeing any independent coverage or WP:SIGCOV whatsoever Spiderone 23:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete — Per nom & by source analysis above by Spiderone. Celestina007 ( talk) 23:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - fails GNG, no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 09:04, 15 November 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment — Struck out sock !votes by both Lynndonald & Joedray per this SPI findings. Celestina007 ( talk) 10:31, 16 November 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.