The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201talk 14:48, 19 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201talk 17:55, 26 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
TISM, the band's article. The record is known for being controversial, and that controversy is covered in the band's article.
Ca2james (
talk) 01:49, 28 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep It was so well known for being controversial that it was described in numerous reliable sources both for the Ken Done legal action and for its title. After the band's demise more media described this EP.
shaidar cuebiyar (
talk) 04:43, 31 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 13:27, 4 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.