The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I agree with both maintenance tags placed on the article. In my humble opinion, this fails both
WP:GNG and
WP:NCORP. It lacks reliable sources covering AudioPorn in depth; most coverage is trivial and AudioPorn is usually not the main subject of the article. For example
this article, which is reliable, only shows a passing mention.
This source focuses on the subject but 'Full Effect Promo' is not an independent source as it's a promotional service for record labels. My
WP:BEFORE search was just coming up with the usual Soundcloud, Discogs, Instagram, Mixcloud, Databeats etc. which any Joe Bloggs can get coverage on.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for
lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for
soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --
Cewbot (
talk) 00:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.