The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I PROD'd this in January but it was de-PROD'd with a suggestion to take to AfD.
The sources in article are mostly business announcements of the "Hey here's what we're going to do" type and fail
WP:CORPDEPTH. I cannot locate any additional sources to indicate this passes
WP:NCORP. The company has now dissolved, producing no fanfare or sources as it did so. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 16:15, 8 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete -- the article exists solely to promote the business, and even includes the pricing model. Wikipedia is not a free means of promotion.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 23:37, 9 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete Non notable subject, finding additional sources would prove problematic. Second the point by K.e.coffman, such a small company should not have it's pricing model on it's article, it is advertising.
SamHolt6 (
talk) 19:55, 11 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete: The best source is the Art Shortcuts item from The Guardian in 2008, but I read that as propositional, merely reporting a new venture pitch. In the absence of in-depth critical coverage of the company and its lifespan, I do not see this as meeting either
WP:CORPDEPTH or
WP:GNG.
AllyD (
talk) 06:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.