The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:56, 27 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete I hardly think a 15 year old would pass
WP:NFOOTY or GNG yet.
Govvy (
talk) 12:03, 27 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. Article concerns a 15-year-old schoolboy who's a promising footballer. He obviously fails
WP:NFOOTY, because he hasn't played in a
fully pro league or at senior international level. I can't find any evidence that he's received enough significant coverage in reliable independent sources to pass
WP:BIO. There's some, but rather less than one might expect for the latest "wonderkid" coming through at a big club. He gets a couple of sentences in a mainstream piece about
"new Irish" making their mark in sport, but little more than namechecks elsewhere. Only
this, which is cited in the article, has any depth at all. Coverage would have to be exceptional for a schoolboy footballer to pass GNG, and it's not. It's
TOOSOON: re-create if and hopefully when he does something noteworthy. cheers,
Struway2 (
talk) 14:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete nothing about this individual is notable.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 03:08, 29 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - Concur with
Struway2 et al.: Fails to meet the criteria of
WP:NFOOTY, insufficient sources available to meet
WP:BIO, and does not otherwise meet
WP:GNG.
TOOSOON. --
Jack Frost (
talk) 06:18, 29 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - Fails
NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a
fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy
GNG.
Fenix down (
talk) 12:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.