From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 22:27, 26 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Armind

Armind (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity label owned by DJ Armin van Buuren, mainly used for his own and associated releases. None of the sources discuss the subject significantly. Does not pass WP:CORP. KingAnd God 09:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 10:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 10:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 10:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bobherry Talk Edits 15:28, 10 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Armada Music is one of, if not the largest and most important dance labels in EDM, [1] and Armin van Buuren is one of the most notable DJs in the world. Armind is an extremely important imprint for both parties and is held in high regard in the music world. It is commonly highly ranked separately from Armada, so its notability is not only by association therefore this is not a case of WP:CORP. [2]. While this article should be improved, it should not be deleted.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Walru5hunterofficial ( talk • contribs)

References

  1. ^ PAPADATOS, MARKOS. "Review: Armada and Armin van Buuren are big winners at 2018 IDMA awards". Digital Journal. Retrieved April 12, 2018.
  2. ^ "THE BEST DANCE MUSIC RECORD LABELS OF 2015 [READER POLL]". EDM sauce. Retrieved April 12, 2018.
@ Walru5hunterofficial: the article is about Armind not Armada or van Buuren. This sublabel has no notability as a separate entity. Notability is not inherited. KingAnd God 10:30, 12 April 2018 (UTC) reply
@ KingAndGod:You clearly didn't read my comment. Armind is held in high regard in the music world and highly ranked SEPARATELY from Armada, its notability is NOT only by association therefore this is not a case of WP:CORP. [1]. While this article should be improved, it should not be deleted.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Walru5hunterofficial ( talk • contribs)

References

  1. ^ "THE BEST DANCE MUSIC RECORD LABELS OF 2015 [READER POLL]". EDM sauce. Retrieved April 12, 2018.
@ Walru5hunterofficial: Merely asserting significance is not enough. There should be in-depth coverage of reliable sources that discuss Armind as a company. KingAnd God 04:28, 13 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 15:47, 18 April 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: fails WP:ORGCRIT. No evidence to back up the claim that this label is "held in high regard", and coming second on a readers poll doesn't demonstrate notability. Not notable just because of its association with van Buuren or with Armada Records, and no reliable sources discussing its notability as an individual entity. Richard3120 ( talk) 23:20, 19 April 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Armind&oldid=1074871375"