From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:59, 17 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Argentina–Germany football rivalry

Argentina–Germany football rivalry (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page was arbitrarily created ahead of the final (recentism) and has no sources but is an excuse for a disambiguation page. We don't create non-existant info...that's the textbook case of OR Lihaas ( talk) 17:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC) reply

The above statements are ridiculous. Couple of reference s below http://thebiglead.com/2014/07/10/germany-argentina-rivalry-history-world-cup-final-2014/

http://m.sportskeeda.com/football/fifa-world-cup-2014-argentina-and-germany-renew-rivalry-final

They may not have a neighbouly rivalry or one which has political connetations like Argentina England..... but which have played three world cup finals and a few aacrimonious quarters including one with a brawl. Recentism claims would carry weight if the final was the first meeting.

202.69.12.28 ( talk) 18:41, 10 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Delete - The subject of the article is valid so Argentina and Germany are going to dispute their third World Cup final next Sunday, beyond previous matches between both sides in group stages. But the article is very short and poorly sourced. - Fma12 ( talk) 19:12, 10 July 2014 (UTC) reply
"Keep"- Needs work, but has improved a lot.

101.50.101.184 ( talk) 19:53, 10 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Well trolling IP...this article shows nothing but a log of previous meetings with nothing to cite a RIVARLY. And recentism - NOTNEWS Lihaas ( talk) 20:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC) reply
Delete, for now, I believe that it would be best to delete the page. Yes, they may have played against each other in two consecutive World Cups (1986 and 1990), but the way the article is currently set up will not be adequate. Please take the Mexico–United States soccer rivalry page for example. JC · Talk · Contributions 20:51, 10 July 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - article confirms that the two teams have played each other quite a few times, but that does not a rivalry make. I can see no evidence of rivalry here -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 21:05, 10 July 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude ( talk) 21:07, 10 July 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:31, 11 July 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:31, 11 July 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:31, 11 July 2014 (UTC) reply
Ya but it needs the political history of the Nazis hiding in Argentina. And that just synthesis.
Plus creation reasoning Lihaas ( talk) 17:56, 11 July 2014 (UTC) reply
The nazis do not belong in this article. Do not confuse it with Argentina–Germany relations, which is a completely different and unrelated article. Cambalachero ( talk) 02:58, 12 July 2014 (UTC) reply
See other rivalry articles that add the political context. (and its also my case in point that it doesn't have anything here) Lihaas ( talk) 04:28, 12 July 2014 (UTC) reply
Well, it is you who is saying that there is some relation between both things; so it is up to you to prove it and write about it. And remember to avoid WP:SYNTHESIS when doing so. Cambalachero ( talk) 13:30, 12 July 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep It is a valid rivalry and recently there have been many reliable news sources talking about it. I call the big one bitey ( talk) 19:21, 13 July 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.