The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep, yes there is indication of notability in the article itself. An a quick google search gives plenty of backing for notability claims. --
Soman (
talk) 05:50, 25 August 2013 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar·· 10:39, 1 September 2013 (UTC)reply
Redirect - per GS.
article in the Ponte Preta site indicates it is a genuine proposal, but at the moment, would be
WP:CRYSTAL for its own article. If anything, the time line on the club site indicates that plans have stalled. Worth comment in the club article, but there does not appear to be sufficient detail available, or confirmation when / if the stadium will actually be built to justify standalone article.
Fenix down (
talk)
Redirect per GiantSnowman. --
MicroX (
talk) 04:29, 6 September 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.